Hamza Shahbaz withdraws bail plea in SC

  • Hamza Shahbaz was arrested in June 2019 in relation to 2 circumstances
  • PML-N chief was denied bail in a single case by LHC
  • NAB has filed a corruption reference in opposition to the opposition chief

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court docket on Friday disposed of a post-arrest bail petition filed by PML-N vice-president and Punjab Meeting Opposition Chief Hamza Shahbaz after his counsel withdrew the plea.

A 3-member bench headed by Justice Mushir Alam and comprising Justice Sardar Tariq Masood and Justice Yahyah Afridi had resumed listening to the plea, which sought bail ifor Hamza in a cash laundering and belongings past means corruption reference filed by the Nationwide Accountability Bureau (NAB).

The PML-N chief had approached the apex court docket in April 2020, two months after the Lahore Excessive Court docket (LHC) denied him bail within the cash laundering case however granted it within the Ramzan Sugar Mills case.

Hamza then sought bail on the grounds of being susceptible to coronavirus in jail however the LHC didn’t agree with the grounds. Following this, the counsel withdrew the appliance and moved the apex court docket.

It could be added right here that Hamza was arrested in June 2019 from contained in the LHC in relation to 2 circumstances pertaining to cash laundering and accumulating belongings past technique of earnings. 

Additionally learn: PML-N’s Hamza Shahbaz complains about struggling coronavirus in jail

At this time’s listening to

Throughout at this time’s listening to, Justice Masood requested Hamza’s counsel if he wished to pursue the case on the idea of advantage or hardship. Advocate Amjad Pervaiz mentioned bail is being sought on hardship as his shopper is in jail. 

Justice Masood questioned how the highest court docket might hear the plea on hardship if there was no point out of it throughout the excessive court docket proceedings. To this, Pervaiz mentioned the scenario was completely different on the time. “There have been no grounds for hardship on the time.”

In his arguments, the counsel mentioned nobody may be indefinitely detained. “No reference had been filed in opposition to Hamza when he utilized for post-arrest bail. The costs in opposition to my shopper have been for Rs7 billion however the reference has been filed for Rs530 million.”

Justice Afridi noticed that it could be acceptable for the petitioner to strategy the excessive court docket on the idea of the accountability court docket repot. 

The apex court docket deposed of the petition after Hamza’s counsel withdrew the appliance. 

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please Disable Ad Blocker It's a Humble Request